A slave who doesn't get to be used very often will inevitably miss seeing his owner. Should he:-
- Be honest and express his desire to see his owner and, in this way, risk bothering him by appearing to be pushing his agenda and forcing an encounter. After all, it's only fair that the master should call upon his slave when he decides, and not the other way around and if a slave wants something, that his master doesn't want, there's a problem somewhere.
- Patiently wait to be called upon and, in this way, risk giving the (false) impression that he doesn't much care, that he can function perfectly well regardless of his owner's presence and fail to show his master how he feels.
4 comments:
Thank you for your opinion and it's good to hear from you again.
i understand your comment on conquering vs. upkeep but i would like to ask you that you please refrain from making comments on my Owner on this blog.
36 hours... that's a long break!
total agree with roblondonsw1
you should offer you to your master... without being intrusive. And if after several days (depends on how patient you are) and another call, you ve got no reply : just bring the chain
i'm re-reading my response and it may sound rather unfriendly. That's not how i mean it.
Your comments (and the above) were very interesting to read. I recently interviewed a potential slave in London. I live some distance away so we wouldn't have seen much of each other but he was willing to give it a go. After meeting him (a very interesting and sexy guy with a mind of his own but a real desire to be a slave) the big doubt in my mind about continuing is the distance between us. I am unsure I want someone so far away and as you posted, does he just sit back and wait on me contacting him or does he "pressurise" me for attention?
Post a Comment